A Thought on the Parasha
Feel free to download and print
the Parasha sheet and share it with your friends and family: Click here: Parashat
Behar-Bechukotai
A Relationship Strained, Not Broken
We finish our reading of Vayikra this week with the
"blessings and the curses": the rewards for keeping the laws and
commandments and the punishments for breaking them. This section, coming
as it does at the end of Vayikra, is clearly intended as a coda to what
preceded it. Namely, it is the penalty clause of the brit at Mount Sinai.
Thus, our parasha opens and closes with the framing of Mount Sinai
(Vayikra, 25:1, 26:46, 27:34).
Contracts generally begin with the terms of the agreement, the
responsibilities of one party to the other. These were spelled out clearly in
Shemot with the Ten Commandments and all the laws in Mishpatim. The mitzvot and
the laws, all the "dos and don'ts," are the way in which the
relationship is translated in practical, day-to-day terms. After the terms of
the contract are laid out, a penalty clause often follows. This is the
blessings and, more significantly, the curses that we find in Bechukotai. This,
then, is the natural culmination of the brit at Sinai. But if this is so, why
does this only come at the end of Vayikra? Why did it not close Parashat Mishpatim?
The best explanation is that a profound rupture occurred between
Parshat Mishpatim and Sefer Vayikra: the Sin of the Golden Calf. Until that
sin, the Torah could hope that the covenant itself would suffice; not every
contract needs a penalty clause. While violating the terms of a contract will
have its consequences, these need not be spelled out in the actual agreement.
God could have reasonably hoped that the descendants of Avraham, Yitzchak, and
Yaakov, those who first had this brit with God, would be committed to the brit
for its own sake. God could have reasonably hoped that a people whom God had
just freed from bondage would understand the meaning of their covenant. But, as
we know, the people failed God, violating the covenant at the first opportunity
and compromising the very relationship.
God realizes that this is a stiff-necked people. God, as it were,
realizes that this is a people that needs the positive and negative
reinforcement of the blessings and the curses, a penalty clause to keep them
committed to the terms of the contract. But the shift in the relationship
is more profound than that. It is clear that, after the Golden Calf, the
relationship can survive even times of violation and profound strain. As
parents know well, we can wish that our children will do what is right because
it is right, but human nature being what it is, punishment (however labeled) is
a necessary form of parenting. And punishment is just that: a form of
parenting. It is an expression of love and concern, of commitment to the
relationship. If we did not care, we would not punish. And if the
relationship could not survive disobedience and misbehavior, if a parent would,
God forbid, walk away from a troublesome child, then punishment would be
unnecessary.
God's initial high expectations of us also meant that when we
failed God, God was ready to give up on us. God was prepared to drop us
and walk away from the relationship: "And now, leave me, and My anger will
kindle against them and I will destroy them, and I will make you-Moshe-into a
great nation" (Shemot, 32:10). Even when God relents, agreeing not to
destroy the people and to stay in the relationship, God does not want to get
too close. God is looking for a long-distance relationship: "And I will
send an angel before you....for I cannot go up in your midst, because you are a
stiff-necked people, lest I destroy you on the way" (33:3). It is only
after Moshe's importuning that God again agrees to resume the relationship as
before: "And God said, my Presence will go [among you] and I will give you
rest" (33:14). God renews the covenant in Shemot (34:11-26), but God
only appends the penalty clause in Parashat Bechukotai.
The renewal of the covenant, the reaffirming of the relationship,
is the turning point. This is the moment that God declares that God will not
give up on the relationship, that God will keep God's Presence among us even
when we violate the covenant. God will not walk out on us. But how is our
imperfect humanity-the fact that we will fail God, that we will not always live
up to the agreement-dealt with in the renewed covenant? Through the blessings
and curses. God will deal with our misbehavior by parenting us when we need it.
God accepts that we are less than perfect. God accounts for this by giving us
positive and negative reinforcement, and God is prepared to deal with our
transgressions and failures and to remain committed to the relationship.
Why, then, the gap between the reaffirmation of the covenant and
our parasha? How does the entirety of Sefer Vayikra factor into this structure?
The answer lies in the fact that good, caring parenting is about more than
rewards and punishments. Good parenting also means providing a good education,
and it means setting up systems to reinforce learning and to cultivate growth
and success. Vayikra is devoted to setting up these systems: the system of kedusha,
holiness, in the Temple and, as we saw last week, the parallel and reinforcing
system of kedusha in the camp. These are designed to reorient our lives and
our society so that we will be focused on God, allowing us to truly abide by
the covenant.
Sometimes, however, even these systems are threatened. But God,
committed to the relationship, has given us ways to protect and, if necessary,
restore them. When the sins of the nation threatened the sanctity of the
Temple, God gave us the rites of Yom Kippur to cleanse the Temple of its
impurity. God made this possible when, after the Golden Calf, God agreed
that the Temple will "dwell amongst them, [even] together with their
impurity" (Vayikra, 16:16). The Temple can survive the tumah of
the nation.
In contrast, the situation is much more severe when the kedusha of
the camp is threatened. Here we are no longer talking about ritual sins
and ritual tumah; here we are talking about true corruption of society, a
profound leaving of God and God's ways. And this becomes intolerable when
what is threatened is the very system of kedusha, the Sabbatical Year and its
profound restructuring of society as one with God at its center.
For this, no ritual, no Temple rites, can provide a solution. The
punishments can hopefully serve their purpose and turn the people back to the
right path, but when they fail to do so, the only solution is to remove the
people from the place of kedusha. The solution is exile. The cleansing of
the land, in contrast to that of the Temple, requires removing the people from
the land and allowing the land to "rest its Shabbats [Seventh
Years]....which it did not rest when you were dwelling on it" (Vayikra,
26:34-35). Through the lessons of exile, the people will hopefully learn
the profound nature of their sin, allowing them to return to the land and once
again attempt to live on it with full respect for the structures of kedusha,
the systems central to living and maintaining the brit.
When the supporting systems of the brit are violated, whether in
the sanctity of the Temple or the Sabbatical Years of the camp, the
relationship will still survive. This has been God's commitment to the Jewish
people since the Sin of the Golden Calf. God is with us through thick and
thin. Even at times when we could no longer live on God's land, when we
failed to build a nation on the principles of kedusha, God remained-and God
remains-committed to us. "And even with all of this-when they are in the
land of their enemies, I have not despised them or rejected them, to destroy
them, to nullify my covenant with them, because I am the Lord their God."
We have come a long way from the Sin of the Calf, and our relationship has
survived moments of severe strain. And even though a drastic response may at
times be necessary, it will survive because the covenant is forever, because
God will always remain our God, committed to an unbreakable relationship with
the Jewish people.
Shabbat
Shalom!
Comments
Post a Comment