Have You Done Your Korban Pesach Yet?
Feel free to download and print
the Parshat
Shmini sheet and share it with your friends and family.
Have You Done Your Korban Pesach Yet?
Parashat
Parah commemorates the process of purification that would precede the bringing
of the korban Pesach.
Appropriately, this year we read it at the end of Parashat Shmini, which
describes how, after the completion of the dedication of the altar, the
sacrifices would henceforth be desired and received in Heaven: "And there
came a fire out from before the Lord, and consumed upon the altar the
burnt offering and the fat: which when all the people saw, they shouted, and
fell on their faces" (Vayikra 9:24). We are thus reminded that the best we
can do today is evoke the memory of the korbanot
and of the korban Pesach;
we are unable to bring them in practice or to do the ideal worship described in
the Torah.
Things
however are not so black and white. There are those who petition the Israeli
government regularly for the right to bring the korban Pesach on the Temple mount. From a halakhic point of view -
political realities aside - this is not as absurd as it may sound.
Let
us start with the theme of Parashat Parah, the need for ritual purification.
Although we are all considered to be temei
met, impure due to contact with a corpse (or being under the same
roof with one, as often occurs in a hospital), this is overridden for a
communal sacrifice: tumah
hutra bi'tzibbur, communal impurity is set aside for communal
sacrifices. While the korban
Pesach is brought by all individuals, not by the community as a
corporate entity, and is, therefore, not technically a community sacrifice, it
nevertheless has this status. As the Gemara Yoma (51a) tells us, it is ba bi'knufya, it
comes en masse,
with every individual of the Jewish people bringing it together.
But what about the fact that there is no Temple? This also need not be a halakhic barrier. The Gemara in Megillah (10a) states that the sanctity of Jerusalem and the Temple from the time of Joshua still remains today. The same Gemara goes on to quote Rabbi Yehoshua who states that, as a result of this sanctity, it is possible to offer sacrifices on the Temple grounds even without a Temple: "shamati she'makrivim af al pi she'eyn bayit," "I have heard that one can offer sacrifices even without a Temple." So while we are ritually impure and without a Temple, it would seem that sacrifices can still be offered.
As
far as the kohanim
are concerned, the general halakhic approach is that kohanim nowadays are
only bichezkat kohanim.
That is, they are presumed to be kohanim, but this is not taken as a certainty
since their exact lineage is unknown (see Rema YD 331:19, Maharit 1:85, and
Shevet HaLevi 3:160). While we would ideally want definite kohanim to serve in the
Beit HaMikdash, without certain knowledge we should be able to rely on
the presumption, as we do in other areas of halakha. We also don't have
the bigdei kehunah,
the priestly garments, but these could be manufactured (and Mechon haMikdash
has already done so!). Because of the materials needed, it would be impossible
to construct the garments of the High Priest, but this is not a problem
since sacrifices can be offered without the High Priest. Thus, with the
manufacture of the proper bigdei
kehunah, it would seem that our kohanim
could halakhically offer the korban
Pesach.
All of these arguments were made by Hatam Sofer in a teshuva (YD 2:236), and he concludes that a korban Pesach can be brought halakhically in modern times. Although written in nineteenth-century Hungary, this responsa was not merely addressing a theoretical question, for he had been asked to appeal to the political leader of Jerusalem to grant Jews this right. He stated that this would not be possible, as the political leadership would only grant Muslims the right of worship on the Temple Mount.
All of these arguments were made by Hatam Sofer in a teshuva (YD 2:236), and he concludes that a korban Pesach can be brought halakhically in modern times. Although written in nineteenth-century Hungary, this responsa was not merely addressing a theoretical question, for he had been asked to appeal to the political leader of Jerusalem to grant Jews this right. He stated that this would not be possible, as the political leadership would only grant Muslims the right of worship on the Temple Mount.
In
the following generation, Rav Tzvi Hirsch Kalisher, a student of Hatam Sofer,
tried to make this theory a reality. Rav Kalisher wrote an entire book, Drishat Tzion, where he
argues for the obligation to bring a korban
Pesach and tries to put this at the top of the communal agenda.
There was a larger historical context for Rav Kalisher's initiative: It
coincided with the beginning of the Reform movement, and high on their agenda
was the rejection of the significance of the Land of Israel and the return
to the Land of Israel. This naturally included the rejection of the whole
institution of sacrifices. It was thus important for Rav Kalisher to reassert
the centrality of the Land of Israel, the Temple, and the sacrifices.
Rav
Kalisher, hoping to get other rabbis to sign on to his initiative, sent his
book to another staunch opponent of the Reform movement, Rav Yaakov Ettlinger
in Altona, Germany, for his approval. Rav Ettlinger did not sign on, and in
response (Teshuvot Binyan Tzion, 1), he offered a surprising counter-text to
the passage in the Talmud stating that one can bring sacrifices without a
Temple. He quotes the Biblical verse, "And I will lay waste your
Sanctuaries, and I will not smell the pleasing odor of the sacrifices"
(Vayikra 26:31). According to Rav Ettlinger, this verse tells us that, although
the Sanctuary retains its sanctity even after its destruction and one can
technically still bring sacrifices, God does not desire such sacrifices. These
would not be considered li'rayach
nichoach, as a sweet savor, and it is a halakhic principle that a
sacrifice that is not considered li'rayach
nichoach is invalid. In an astounding move in a
halakhic, Torah
she'b'al Peh argument, Rav Ettlinger asserts, "although
the Talmud says that one can still bring sacrifices, God states: 'I will not
smell their pleasing odor'!" God trumps the Talmud!
But
what about the statement that sacrifices can still be brought? Rav Ettlinger
answers that this only applies when God is no longer "laying waste to the
Sanctuary." Thus one can bring sacrifices when the Temple is being built but
has not yet been completed, as in the beginning of the Second Commonwealth or
as will be in Messianic times. But as long as the Temple is laid waste, God is
telling us that God does not want our sacrifices.
Rav Naftali Tzvi Yehudah Berlin - the Netziv - endorsed Rav Ettlinger's general approach, but disagreed with him in regards to the korban Pesach (HaAmek Davar, Devarim 16:3). Netziv argues that the korban Pesach can still be brought nowadays because it is the only sacrifice that is not described in the Torah as being offered li'rayach nichoach. It thus makes no difference that God will not accept it as a sweet savor - it is valid without this!
Rav Naftali Tzvi Yehudah Berlin - the Netziv - endorsed Rav Ettlinger's general approach, but disagreed with him in regards to the korban Pesach (HaAmek Davar, Devarim 16:3). Netziv argues that the korban Pesach can still be brought nowadays because it is the only sacrifice that is not described in the Torah as being offered li'rayach nichoach. It thus makes no difference that God will not accept it as a sweet savor - it is valid without this!
This
insight points to a unique feature of the korban Pesach: it is the one sacrifice that
is not brought primarily to be offered on the altar but to be eaten. This is
evidenced in the fact that all other sacrifices that can be offered in cases of
communal impurity, can nevertheless not be eaten in a state of impurity, with
the exception of the korban
Pesach: "for it is only brought at the outset for the sake of
being eaten" (Mishna Pesachim 76b). Remember, also, that there was no
altar for the first korban
Pesach, only the doorposts of the houses on which the blood was
placed. The key verse for this korban is,
"and they shall eat the meat on that night" (Shemot 12:8). The focus
is on the home ritual, on the eating of the meat, and not on the offering of
the korban.
As such, argues Netziv, it can be done today, as there is no need for it to be
considered li'rayach
nichoach.
There
are many people who live in the tension between Rav Ettlinger and the Netziv.
On the one hand, they find it hard to identify with the offering of sacrifices
as something that God desires, but on the other, they sense that something is
religiously lacking from our less embodied, less physical forms of worship. The
Godly connection and religious community created through the shared eating of
the korban Pesach
is echoed today in the Pesach Seder in our homes, but the echo is a faint one. Even
when sacrifices are no longer part of our religious worship of God, it is our
duty to find ways in which we can continue to live a powerful, embodied
religious and communal life so that all of our service should be li'rayach nichoach,
received as a sweet savor, by God.
Shabbat Shalom!
Comments
Post a Comment