The Seductions of Idolatry
Feel free to download and print
the Parashat VaEtchanan sheet and share it
with your friends and family.
The
Seduction of Idolatry
Much of the
book of Devarim is devoted to warning the people against being seduced by
idolatry when they enter the land. It is often hard for us to appreciate why
idolatry was such a temptation in the past. To better understand the
attraction, we must look more closely at the metaphors and images the verses
use in the exhortations against it.
This week's parasha
contains two very different prohibitions against idolatry. One occurs in
the repetition of the Ten Commandments: "Thou shalt have no other gods
before me....Do not bow down to them and do not worship them, for I, the
Lord thy God, am a jealous God (Devarim 5:7,9). This is a clear
prohibition against abandoning faith in the one true God for belief in foreign
gods. The Torah tells us not to "have" any other gods, not to believe
in them or accept them as gods over us. It also tells us that this applies to
action as well as belief; we cannot worship these gods or bow down to them.
The end of
the verse provides a powerful metaphor for this form of idolatry. God describes
Godself as an E-l kanna, a "jealous God." Elsewhere, the trait
of jealousy is associated with a husband who suspects his wife of committing
adultery: "If a man's wife strays and breaks faith with him....a fit of
jealousy (ruach kinnah) comes over him and he is jealous (vi'keenei)
for his wife who has become defiled" (Bamidbar 5:12,14). This jealousy
comes to the fore when a bond of fidelity has been broken, when one of the
parties gives loyalty, worship, or even a part of him- or herself to another.
Thus, the
act of idolatry is often compared to fornication: "And this people will
rise up, and go a whoring after the alien gods of the land ... and will forsake
me, and break my covenant which I have made with them" (31:16). In this
metaphor, God is the husband and the children of Israel are the wife, firstly,
because the husband is understood to hold the position of authority, and
secondly, because in a polygamous society marriage only demanded fidelity from
the wife. Our belief in and worship of God must be to the exclusion of all
others. God, on the other hand, is free to have relationships with the other
nations of the earth.
Beyond
speaking to the aspect of betrayal, this framing also points to one of the
seductive aspects of idolatry. Many idolatrous cults incorporated sexual acts
in the worship of their gods, hence the kedeishot (cult prostitutes)
referred to in the Torah. Moreover, as we saw at the end of Parashat Balak,
women would call to people to have sex with them and to participate in the
worship of their gods. Sex and idolatry become intertwined; the worshipper
"fornicates" with other gods both literally and figuratively. We can
now understand why Pinchas was described as kanno et kinnati,
"jealous/zealous on my behalf," when he rose to slay Zimri. He
embodied God's double jealousy over the people's spiritual and literal
fornication and acted appropriately.
This double
sense of fornication appears earlier in the Torah, in the book of Shemot:
For thou
shalt worship no other god: for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a
jealous God; Lest thou make a covenant with the inhabitants of the land,
and they go a whoring after their gods, and do sacrifice unto their gods, and
one call thee, and thou eat of his sacrifice; And thou take of their daughters
unto thy sons, and their daughters go a whoring after their gods, and make thy
sons go a whoring after their gods (Shemot 34:14-16).
In these
verses, fidelity is transferred not just to a different god, but to a different
people; the breaking of the covenant with God finds its counterpart in the
making of a covenant with the people of the land. This whoring,
jealousy-provoking betrayal of God is reflected and reinforced through the
sexual pull of these pagan sons and daughters. It is an abandonment of God for
other gods and the sexual freedoms they provide. The Sages put it succinctly:
"Israel did not worship foreign gods except to give themselves permission
to do sexual transgressions out in the open" (Sanhedrin 63b).
It would be
misguided, however, to believe that greater sexual freedom was the only pull
that idolatry exerted on the people when they entered the land. There is
something in the words "fornication" or "to go whoring"
that communicates more than adultery and the breaking of trust. There is a
sense of indiscriminate activity, of sleeping with any passerby who will pay
the price. The attraction here is for the thrill, the excitement, the novelty
of the experience. After many years, people may become bored with worship that
is so familiar to them. They see and hear things which sound unusual,
unfamiliar, and hence, exciting. Over-familiarity can often erode eroticism and
passion. There is also a much greater variety of worship, and something
indiscriminate about the worship itself: "You shall utterly destroy all
the places, wherein the nations which ye shall possess served their gods, upon
the high mountains, and upon the hills, and under every green tree"
(12:2). The variety and opportunities afforded by this worship, especially when
contrasted to the single-Temple, highly-structured worship in the Torah, can be
powerfully seductive.
But there is
another type of idolatry as well, one that has nothing to do with adultery,
jealousy, or betrayal. It appears earlier in the parasha, when Moshe is
describing the events surrounding the giving of the Torah at Har Sinai:
And
the Lord spoke unto you out of the midst of the fire: you heard the
voice of the words, but saw no similitude; you heard only a voice....Take you
therefore good heed unto yourselves; for you saw no manner of similitude on the
day that the Lord spoke unto you in Horeb out of the midst of the
fire: Lest you act corruptly, and make you a graven image, the similitude of
any figure, the likeness of male or female (4:12,15-16).
Moshe is
warning the people to not make idols and bow down to them, but this is clearly
not the worship of foreign gods. The people are told twice, "you 'saw no
similitude' on the day that you received the Torah." The point here is
obvious: having experienced this tremendous theophany, seen the thunder and
lightning, and heard God's voice, it is very possible that the people will
trick themselves into thinking that they actually saw some image of God.
Wanting to recapture that experience, they might then make some image to
represent what they think they saw. This would not be the worship of a foreign
god, but worship of the one true God through an image. The problem is
not betrayal, and the key word is not fornication. The problem here is
corruption: "Lest you act corruptly." To make an image of God is to
corrupt who God is. It is to bring God down, to make God part of this world:
concrete, imaginable, easily accessible. The radical theology of the Torah is
not simply in there being one God rather than many gods. It is also in God's
complete transcendence of the physical world, a God for whom any physical
representation is a corruption.
This word,
corrupt, sh'ch't,is also the key word used in describing the sin of the
golden calf. "Go down quickly, for your people have acted corruptly,"
"ki sheecheit amekha" (9:12, and Shemot 32:7). To me this is
clear evidence that the sin of the golden calf was not the worship of other
gods-something that would make no sense in the context of just having seen all
of God's miracles-but rather the need to create a concrete way of accessing God
in Moshe's absence. This is the other way in which idolatry can be so
seductive. It is exceedingly hard to worship an unseen God, to know that any
image that we have in our heads is fundamentally false. How much easier it
would be if we could direct our worship towards some representation of God, be
it an object or a person! The Torah, however, demands from us a purity of
belief and a purity of worship.
We live in a
world where idolatry is not our chief concern. As one writer put it, the
problem today is not too many gods, but too few. But I would go further. The
chief problem is not the ability to believe in God. It is maintaining a system
of belief that demands we turn away from the seductions and freedoms of the
world, that we find a way to deepen our relationship rather than to go looking
for new thrills, and that we find the deep satisfaction that comes with
loyalty, consistency, and a relationship that is honest and true.
Shabbat Shalom!
Comments
Post a Comment